华西医学

华西医学

肝细胞癌术后胸腺法新治疗的临床观察及成本效用分析

查看全文

目的评估胸腺法新(thymalfasin,Tα1)作为乙型肝炎病毒(hepatitis B virus,HBV)相关肝细胞癌(hepatocellular carcinoma,HCC)术后辅助治疗的疗效及安全性,并对术后使用 Tα1 进行成本效用分析。方法回顾性收集 2007 年 2 月—2015 年 12 月于四川大学华西医院、成都军区总院和中山大学附属第三医院接受肝切除术的 HBV 相关 HCC 的患者,分成 Tα1 组和观察组,采用 Kaplan-Meier 法及对数秩检验,评估 Tα1 治疗起至死亡的总生存期、无复发生存期及安全性;建立马尔可夫模型,计算与观察组相比 Tα1 术后辅助治疗的质量调整生命年(quality-adjusted life years,QALY)及增量成本效用比(incremental cost-effectiveness ratio,ICER)。成本数据来源于上述 3 家医院医院信息系统和电话随访,健康效用值数据主要来源于既往已发表的文献,敏感性分析用于探究关键变量对于结果的影响。结果共纳入 208 例 HCC 患者,其中 48 例术后接受 Tα1 治疗(Tα1 组),160 例仅随访观察(观察组),两组基线资料差异无统计学意义。Tα1 组和观察组的中位总生存期分别为 102.0 个月[95% 置信区间(confidence interval,CI)(74.8,129.2)个月]和 81.6 个月[(95%CI(65.7,97.6)个月],差异有统计学意义(P=0.047);中位无复发生存期分别为 66.7 个月[95%CI(17.3,116.1)个月]和 37.4 个月[95%CI(28.7,46.2)个月],差异有统计学意义(P=0.044)。治疗期间,无Ⅲ-Ⅳ级不良反应及致死性不良反应。Tα1 组对比观察组的 ICER 为 108 050.02 元/QALY,该 ICER 值小于意愿支付(177 785.25 元/QALY)。结论Tα1 作为术后 HBV 相关 HCC 患者的辅助治疗可改善患者的预后,且费用在我国目前能够接受的水平范围内,故该方案与观察组相比具备成本效用优势。

ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of thymalfasin (Tα1) as an adjuvant therapy for hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after surgery.MethodsPatients with HBV-related HCC who underwent hepatectomy from February 2007 to December 2015 in West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu Military General Hospital, or the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University were retrospectively collected and divided into the Tα1 group and the observation group. Log-rank test and Kaplan-Meier curve were used to assess the overall survival, recurrence-free survival, and safety of patients. A Markov model was used to calculate the quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the Tα1 group compared with the observation group. Cost data was from the hospital information system of the three hospitals. Utility scores mainly came from published data. Sensitivity analyses were applied to explore the impact of essential variables.ResultsA total of 208 patients with HCC after liver resection were enrolled, among them 48 received Tα1 treatment (the Tα1 group) and 160 were only followed up (the observation group). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the baseline characteristics. The median overall survival of the Tα1 group and the observation group was 102.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI) (74.8, 129.2) months] and 81.6 months [95%CI (65.7, 97.6) months], respectively, and the difference was statisitically significant (P=0.047); the median recurrence-free survival was 66.7 months [95%CI (17.3, 116.1) months] and 37.4 months [95%CI (28.7, 46.2) months], respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P=0.044). There were no grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ adverse events and no treatment-related death occurred. The ICER of Tα1 group was ¥108 050.02/QALY, which was less than the willingness to pay (¥177 785.25/QALY).ConclusionsTα1, as an adjuvant therapy for HBV-related HCC patients, can improve the prognosis of the patients, and the cost is within the acceptable level in our country, so this strategy is likely to be a cost-effective option compared with the observation group.

关键词: 胸腺法新; 肝细胞癌; 辅助治疗; 无复发生存; 总生存; 成本效用; 敏感性分析

Key words: Thymalfasin; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Adjuvant therapy; Recurrence-free survival; Overall survival; Cost-effectiveness; Sensitive analyses

引用本文: 王新源, 文凤, 朱永强, 凌云彪, 李秋. 肝细胞癌术后胸腺法新治疗的临床观察及成本效用分析. 华西医学, 2018, 33(12): 1471-1478. doi: 10.7507/1002-0179.201811022 复制

登录后 ,请手动点击刷新查看图表内容。 没有账号,
1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin, 2011, 61(2): 69-90.
2. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin, 2015, 65(2): 87-108.
3. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, et al. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer, 2010, 127(12): 2893-2917.
4. Bruix J, Sherman M. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update. Hepatology, 2011, 53(3): 1020-1022.
5. Ming L, Thorgeirsson SS, Gail MH, et al. Dominant role of hepatitis B virus and cofactor role of aflatoxin in hepatocarcinogenesis in Qidong, China. Hepatology, 2002, 36(5): 1214-1220.
6. Sohn W, Paik YH, Lee MW, et al. Predisposing factors for recurrence of HBV-related small hepatocellular carcinoma after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation. Scand J Gastroenterol, 2014, 49(3): 373-380.
7. Sasaki K, Shindoh J, Nishioka Y, et al. Impact of viral etiology on postoperative De Novo recurrence after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients. J Gastrointest Surg, 2017, 21(3): 487-495.
8. Perz JF, Armstrong GL, Farrington LA, et al. The contributions of hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus infections to cirrhosis and primary liver cancer worldwide. J Hepatol, 2006, 45(4): 529-538.
9. Yang T, Lu JH, Zhai J, et al. High viral load is associated with poor overall and recurrence-free survival of hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma after curative resection: a prospective cohort study. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2012, 38(8): 683-691.
10. Yu SJ, Kim YJ. Hepatitis B viral load affects prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol, 2014, 20(34): 12039-12044.
11. Meng W, Bai B, Bai Z, et al. The immunosuppression role of alpha-fetoprotein in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Discov Med, 2016, 21(118): 489-494.
12. Bruix J, Takayama T, Mazzaferro V, et al. Adjuvant sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma after resection or ablation (STORM): a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Oncol, 2015, 16(13): 1344-1354.
13. Forner A, Llovet JM, Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet, 2012, 379(9822): 1245-1255.
14. Goldstein AL, Guha A, Zatz MM, et al. Purification and biological activity of thymosin, a hormone of the thymus gland. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1972, 69(7): 1800-1803.
15. Fan YZ, Chang H, Yu Y, et al. Thymosin alpha1 suppresses proliferation and induces apoptosis in human leukemia cell lines. Peptides, 2006, 27(9): 2165-2173.
16. Moretti S, Oikonomou V, Garaci E, et al. Thymosin alpha 1: burying secrets in the thymus. Expert Opin Biol Ther, 2015, 15(1): S51-S58.
17. Serafino A, Pierimarchi P, Pica F, et al. Thymosin alpha1 as a stimulatory agent of innate cell-mediated immune response. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2012, 1270: 13-20.
18. Gish RG, Gordon SC, Nelson D, et al. A randomized controlled trial of thymalfasin plus transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Int, 2009, 3(3): 480-489.
19. Jeng WJ, Lin CC, Chen WT, et al. Adjuvant therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma after curative treatment. Dig Dis, 2014, 32(6): 747-754.
20. Kim BK, Jy P, Kim DY, et al. Persistent hepatitis B viral replication affects recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after curative resection. Liver Int, 2008, 28(3): 393-401.
21. Cheng SQ, Wu MC, Chen H, et al. Antiviral therapy using lamivudine and thymosin α1 for hepatocellular carcinoma coexisting with chronic hepatitis B infection. Hepato-gastroenterology, 2006, 53(68): 249-252.
22. He C, Peng W, Li C, et al. Thymalfasin, a promising adjuvant therapy in small hepatocellular carcinoma after liver resection. Medicine, 2017, 96(16): e6606.
23. Watanabe H, Okada M, Kaji Y, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours-revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Gan To Kagaku Ryoho, 2009, 36(13): 2495-2501.
24. National Cancer Institute. Common terminology criteria for adverse events v. 3.0 and v. 4.0 (CTCAE). https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic_applications/ctc.htm.
25. Sonnenberg F, Beck JR. Markov models in medical decision making: a practical guide. Med Decis Making, 1993, 13(4): 322-338.
26. Purmonen T, Martikainen JA, Soini EJ, et al. Economic evaluation of sunitinib malate in second-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Finland. Clin Ther, 2008, 30(2): 382-392.
27. 《中国药物经济学评价指南》课题组, 刘国恩, 胡善联, 等. 中国药物经济学评价指南 (2011 版). 中国药物经济学, 2011(3): 6-48.
28. Cucchetti A, Piscaglia F, Cescon M, et al. Cost-effectiveness of hepatic resection versus percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for early hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol, 2013, 59(2): 300-307.
29. Suh CH, Kim KW, Park SH, et al. Performing gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI after CT for guiding curative treatment of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2018, 210(2): W63-W69.
30. Murray CJ, Evans DB, Acharya A, et al. Development of WHO guidelines on generalized cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Econ, 2000, 9(3): 235-251.
31. Tangka FK, Trogdon JG, Richardson LC, et al. Cancer treatment cost in the United States has the burden shifted over time?. Cancer, 2010, 116(14): 3477-3484.
32. Zhang P, Yang Y, Wen F, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of antiviral therapy in patients with advanced hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2016, 31(12): 1978-1985.
33. Ko CJ, Chien SY, Chou CT, et al. Factors affecting prognosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma in Taiwanese patients following hepatic resection. Can J Gastroenterol, 2011, 25(9): 485-491.
34. Hosaka T, Ikeda K, Kobayashi M, et al. Predictive factors of advanced recurrence after curative resection of small hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Int, 2009, 29(5): 736-742.
35. Hung H. Treatment modalities for hepatocellular carcinoma. Curr Cancer Drug Targets, 2005, 5(2): 131-138.
36. 宋继勇, 杜国盛, 朱志东, 等. 胸腺法新在肿瘤患者肝移植术后应用的安全性研究. 中华损伤与修复杂志: 电子版, 2014, 9(2): 166-168.
37. 邱济海, 杨亦德. 胸腺法新联合恩替卡韦治疗慢性乙型肝炎效果观察. 中国乡村医药, 2018, 25(2): 24-25.
38. 李涛, 李政文, 文华长. 高剂量胸腺五肽在原发性肝癌栓塞治疗中的应用和安全性研究. 中华肿瘤杂志, 2007, 29(12): 941-942.